Access to Information Request: EHSS vetting rubrics, withdrawal reasons, and usage data
Dear Environmental Protection Department,
Under the Code on Access to Information, I request existing records concerning the EV-charging at Home Subsidy Scheme (EHSS).
This request supports a policy research project evaluating the allocation fairness, dropout causes, and post-completion utilisation of public infrastructure subsidies in Hong Kong residential car parks.
I have checked the EHSS public portal and confirmed that the specific datasets requested below are not currently available in public registers. To keep this request focused, please provide the following specific records in machine-readable format (CSV or Excel) where applicable:
1. Aggregated Applicant Breakdown (October 2020 – December 2023):
An aggregated table of all EHSS applications received, showing the total counts of applications received, approved, rejected, and withdrawn, broken down by:
1.1 District Council district (18 districts);
1.2 Housing type (Private Residential Estate, Home Ownership Scheme, Sandwich Class Housing); and
1.3 Building age (<10 years, 10–25 years, 26–40 years, >40 years).
2. Assessment Criteria & Withdrawal Categorisation:
2.1 Copies of internal assessment checklists, scoring rubrics, or technical vetting guidelines used by department officers to evaluate application eligibility and grid capacity feasibility.
2.2 A categorized summary of the recorded reason codes for the 28 approved estates (~5,000 spaces) that withdrew post-approval (e.g., Owners' Corporation deadlock, transformer/grid limits, financial overruns, or procurement issues).
3. Post-Completion Usage Reports & Telemetry:
3.1 A blank copy of the official submission template for the mandatory "Report on Use of the EVCEI".
3.2 An aggregated summary of operational data collected from these submitted reports, specifically average daily charger turnover rates per district, equipment fault frequencies, and total electricity consumed (kWh).
Please note that this request seeks only non-personal, aggregated public administration records and does not include any personal data.
Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to your reply within the standard timeframe.
Yours faithfully,
Mr. Sheery Chan
Thank you for your email. This is to confirm receipt of your email and a
reply will be sent to you where necessary.
Environmental Protection Department
(The above message is generated by an auto-reply program.)
謝謝閣下的電子郵件，有需要的話，我們會盡快給你回覆。
環境保護署
（以上為電腦自動發出的訊息。）
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your email dated 5.10.2026.
Further to the auto-reply, we would like to inform you that we are
processing your enquiry.
Regards,
Francisca CHAN
Environmental Protection Department
-----Original Message-----
From: [ATI #1648 email]
<[ATI #1648 email]>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2026 12:03 PM
To: EPD_Enquiry/EPD <[Environmental Protection Department request email]>
Subject: E(26/8026)Access to Information request - Access to Information
Request: EHSS vetting rubrics, withdrawal reasons, and usage data
Dear Environmental Protection Department,
Under the Code on Access to Information, I request existing records
concerning the EV-charging at Home Subsidy Scheme (EHSS).
This request supports a policy research project evaluating the allocation
fairness, dropout causes, and post-completion utilisation of public
infrastructure subsidies in Hong Kong residential car parks.
I have checked the EHSS public portal and confirmed that the specific
datasets requested below are not currently available in public registers.
To keep this request focused, please provide the following specific
records in machine-readable format (CSV or Excel) where applicable:
1. Aggregated Applicant Breakdown (October 2020 – December 2023):
An aggregated table of all EHSS applications received, showing the total
counts of applications received, approved, rejected, and withdrawn, broken
down by:
1.1 District Council district (18 districts);
1.2 Housing type (Private Residential Estate, Home Ownership Scheme,
Sandwich Class Housing); and
1.3 Building age (<10 years, 10–25 years, 26–40 years, >40 years).
2. Assessment Criteria & Withdrawal Categorisation:
2.1 Copies of internal assessment checklists, scoring rubrics, or
technical vetting guidelines used by department officers to evaluate
application eligibility and grid capacity feasibility.
2.2 A categorized summary of the recorded reason codes for the 28 approved
estates (~5,000 spaces) that withdrew post-approval (e.g., Owners'
Corporation deadlock, transformer/grid limits, financial overruns, or
procurement issues).
3. Post-Completion Usage Reports & Telemetry:
3.1 A blank copy of the official submission template for the mandatory
"Report on Use of the EVCEI".
3.2 An aggregated summary of operational data collected from these
submitted reports, specifically average daily charger turnover rates per
district, equipment fault frequencies, and total electricity consumed
(kWh).
Please note that this request seeks only non-personal, aggregated public
administration records and does not include any personal data.
Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to your reply within the
standard timeframe.
Yours faithfully,
Mr. Sheery Chan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[ATI #1648 email]
Is [Environmental Protection Department request email] the wrong address for Access to Information requests
to Environmental Protection Department? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[1]https://accessinfo.hk/change_request/new...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]https://accessinfo.hk/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an ATI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's ATI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://accessinfo.hk/change_request/new...
2. https://accessinfo.hk/help/officers