Relative Citation Ratio metric use

Scott Edmunds made this Freedom of Information request to University Grants Committee Secretariat

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Dear University Grants Committee Secretariat,

In a similar manner to the NIH/Wellcome Trust and other funders, can I ask if the UGC/RGC are using the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) (see: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.100...) in their research assessments?

Yours faithfully,

Scott Edmunds

Mail Delivery System,

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[University Grants Committee Secretariat request email]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[University Grants Committee Secretariat request email]>:
host dmeas18.imail.scig.gov.hk [202.128.251.59]:
550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <[FOI #176 email]>
Received: from alaveteli by accessinfohk with local (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[FOI #176 email]>)
id 1de7zt-0006wa-O1; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:56:41 +0000
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:56:41 +0000
From: Scott Edmunds <[FOI #176 email]>
To: FOI requests at University Grants Committee Secretariat <[University Grants Committee Secretariat request email]>
Message-ID: <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Relative Citation Ratio metric use
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear University Grants Committee Secretariat,

In a similar manner to the NIH/Wellcome Trust and other funders, can I ask if the UGC/RGC are using the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) (see: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.100...) in their research assessments?

Yours faithfully,

Scott Edmunds

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a request under the Code of Access to Information facilitated via the accessinfo.hk website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #176 email]

Is [University Grants Committee Secretariat request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to University Grants Committee Secretariat? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://accessinfo.hk/en/change_request/...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://accessinfo.hk/en/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Sent request to University Grants Committee Secretariat again, using a new contact address.

Dear University Grants Committee Secretariat,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of University Grants Committee Secretariat's handling of my FOI request 'Relative Citation Ratio metric use'.

I sent this enquiry many months ago so am sending it again this is long overdue by law. My question again is:

In a similar manner to the NIH/Wellcome Trust and other funders, can I ask if the UGC/RGC are using the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) (see https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pbi... ) in their research assessments?

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://accessinfo.hk/en/request/relativ...

Yours faithfully,

Scott Edmunds

University Grants Committee Secretariat

Dear Scott Edmunds,

Thank you for your email on 1 March 2018.  Please note that UGC/RGC are
not using the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) in the research assessments.

Regards,
University Grants Committee Secretariat